The recent developments surrounding former Governor of Kogi State, Yahaya Bello, and the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) have sparked a national debate about the tactics and intentions of the anti-graft body. While the EFCC has a critical role in investigating and prosecuting financial crimes, its recent handling of Bello’s case raises significant questions about its professionalism and respect for due process.

Yahaya Bello, facing allegations of money laundering and embezzlement of state funds, voluntarily appeared at the EFCC headquarters in Abuja to cooperate with their investigation. This gesture, which demonstrates a willingness to clear his name, should have led to a straightforward legal process. Instead, the EFCC allowed him to leave without interrogation, only to issue a statement hours later declaring him a wanted person.

In an even more concerning twist, EFCC operatives reportedly descended upon the Kogi State Government Lodge in Asokoro, Abuja, later that evening, allegedly attempting to arrest Bello by force. According to his media aide, Michael Ohiare, there were reports of gunfire, adding a disturbing layer of aggression to the situation. These heavy-handed actions are deeply concerning, particularly when considering that Bello had shown no signs of resisting the law.

The question that now arises is why the EFCC, having dismissed Bello earlier in the day, would resort to such an extreme and unnecessary show of force. This sequence of events raises legitimate concerns that the agency may be overstepping its mandate, or worse, that it is being influenced by political motives rather than a genuine pursuit of justice.

This situation should never have escalated to this point. The EFCC has a duty to investigate allegations of corruption, but it must do so in a way that is fair, transparent, and consistent with the law. The siege at the Government Lodge, combined with the sporadic gunfire, was not only excessive but also avoidable. These tactics are inappropriate in a democratic society where the rule of law should prevail over displays of force.

Moreover, the EFCC’s inconsistent approach to this case — first releasing Bello without questioning him, then later attempting a dramatic arrest — damages the agency’s credibility. Such actions fuel public skepticism, reinforcing the perception that the Commission might be selectively pursuing cases based on political affiliations rather than objective evidence of wrongdoing.

To restore public trust, the EFCC must ensure that its investigations and arrests are driven solely by the pursuit of justice. If the agency has legitimate charges to bring against Yahaya Bello, it should do so through the proper legal channels without resorting to theatrics or intimidation.

Ultimately, the fight against corruption is too important to be undermined by questionable actions that cast doubt on the integrity of the process. The EFCC must be held to the highest standards of transparency and accountability, especially in high-profile cases involving political figures. This will not only ensure fairness for the individuals involved but also protect the broader public interest.

As this situation unfolds, it is crucial for all parties to act within the confines of the law. The EFCC should return to its core mission of fighting financial crimes with integrity, free from external pressures or political bias. Only then can it regain the confidence of Nigerians and continue to play its critical role in the nation’s anti-corruption efforts.